Actually, i was not notice about this issue before.
But, this morning, i open twitter and reliaze his name.
Who is him?
When i discuss about him with my friends, actually, i am agree with police to arrest him.
Why??
because he was rude to Sultan Johor and i think if you want to say to someone,
please dont put in social media.
Just make a discussion with friend and dont put black and white.
Who are agree with me??
I try to find his statement in FB, but, didn't find it. Why???
Is this issue real?? or just propaganda??
Hurm... no comment.
Refer to (1) : http://anilnetto.com/democracy/vigil-for-ahmad-abd-jalil/
A
small group is holding a vigil at Dataran Merdeka to call for the release of
Ahmad Abd Jalil, who has been remanded for three days until tomorrow on a fresh
charge under the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Act.
He had earlier been arrested under the
Sedition Act but was freed by a Johor Bharu magistrate – only to be promptly
and controversially re-arrested by police.
refer to (2): http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/litee/print/malaysia/short-lived-freedom-for-youth-accused-of-royal-facebook-slur/
KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 5 ― The police today rearrested
Ahmad Abd Jalil after a Johor magistrate freed him from a three-day remand
order for allegedly insulting the state Ruler, allegedly telling the youth’s
family that they were acting on orders from “orang atas” (higher-ups), a family
member has said.
Ahmad, who was detained last Friday for a sedition
probe over his alleged Facebook insult against the Johor Sultan, was
immediately taken away by police after he was uncuffed in court this evening,
despite protests from his lawyers and family.
“Legally, Ahmad has been FREED by d magistrate. But
d POLIS wants 2take him back to IPK. We are insisting that Ahmad follow us.
Police still...?” said Ahmad’s father Abd Jalil Abd Rahman in a text message to The Malaysian Insider at around 4.30pm today.
IPK refers to “ibu pejabat polis kontinjen” or the
Johor police contingent headquarters, where the 27-year-old Ahmad has been held
for the past few days. In his next text message at 5.25pm, Abd Jalil said,
“Majestret dah LEPAS Ahmad tapi inspector Nazri dan 2 anggota tak pakai uniform
dah bawa balik Ahmad ke IPK. Sekarang dia ‘under arrest’ dgn charge lain pula
(Multimedia Act).”
[Translation: The magistrate has freed Ahmad but
inspector Nazri and two plainclothes police officers have brought Ahmad back to
the Johor police contingent headquarters. Now, he is ‘under arrest’ for a
different charge (Multimedia Act).] In a phone call to The Malaysian Insider later, another family member
of Ahmad’s who declined to be named alleged that the police have admitted that
they were keeping the youth in their custody due to orders from above.
“Ahmad was released because the magistrate said
they failed to get statement from him in the three days they held him. “They
opened his cuffs but then did not release him... saying that this is an
instruction from ‘orang atas’. So tomorrow, they will bring him again to the
court to seek another remand order. “Who is this ‘orang atas’?” the family
member said.
According to Ahmad’s lawyer on Saturday, the police
had informed the youth that he was being investigated under Section 4(1) of the
Sedition Act 1948 over a Facebook post that allegedly insulted the Johor
Sultan.
English daily The Star had today quoted acting
Johor CID chief ACP Abd Aziz Ahmad as saying in a statement that the posts were
published on October 21 and had implied that Sultan Ibrahim was unfit to be the
state ruler. According to the news report, Ahmad is also being investigated
under the Communications and Multimedia Act.
Speaking to The Malaysian Insider later
tonight, Abd Jalil said he still feared for his son’s safety, complaining that
he was in the dark as to what would happen next. He pointed out that since the
magistrate had freed Ahmad from remand, the police should not have carted his
son back to a lock-up.
“As it is, they made us wait in court this morning
from 8.30am until about 4pm before Ahmad was brought to see us,” he said. Abd
Jalil explained that even then, the youth was brought to court by three men,
only one of which was dressed in full police uniform. The others, he said, were in plainclothes.
“When Ahmad was freed, the driver ― a big guy
dressed in a red shirt ― looked particularly unhappy. “He pulled aside the
inspector and they had a discussion for a while before they took Ahmad back to
their car, instead of releasing him to us
“That was when we were told that they were acting
on orders from above,” Abd Jalil said.
“Who is that guy in the red shirt? Why was he so
unhappy that Ahmad was freed?” he continued. At present, Abd Jalil said he was
unsure if Ahmad will be brought again to the court tomorrow for the police to
obtain another remand order.
Ahmad, who was detained last Friday for a sedition
probe over his alleged Facebook insult against the Johor Sultan, was
immediately taken away by police after he was uncuffed in court this evening,
despite protests from his lawyers and family.
“Legally, Ahmad has been FREED by d magistrate. But
d POLIS wants 2take him back to IPK. We are insisting that Ahmad follow us.
Police still...?” said Ahmad’s father Abd Jalil Abd Rahman in a text message to The Malaysian Insider at around 4.30pm today.
IPK refers to “ibu pejabat polis kontinjen” or the
Johor police contingent headquarters, where the 27-year-old Ahmad has been held
for the past few days. In his next text message at 5.25pm, Abd Jalil said,
“Majestret dah LEPAS Ahmad tapi inspector Nazri dan 2 anggota tak pakai uniform
dah bawa balik Ahmad ke IPK. Sekarang dia ‘under arrest’ dgn charge lain pula
(Multimedia Act).”
[Translation: The magistrate has freed Ahmad but
inspector Nazri and two plainclothes police officers have brought Ahmad back to
the Johor police contingent headquarters. Now, he is ‘under arrest’ for a
different charge (Multimedia Act).] In a phone call to The Malaysian Insider later, another family member
of Ahmad’s who declined to be named alleged that the police have admitted that
they were keeping the youth in their custody due to orders from above.
“Ahmad was released because the magistrate said
they failed to get statement from him in the three days they held him. “They
opened his cuffs but then did not release him... saying that this is an
instruction from ‘orang atas’. So tomorrow, they will bring him again to the
court to seek another remand order. “Who is this ‘orang atas’?” the family
member said.
According to Ahmad’s lawyer on Saturday, the police
had informed the youth that he was being investigated under Section 4(1) of the
Sedition Act 1948 over a Facebook post that allegedly insulted the Johor
Sultan.
English daily The Star had today quoted acting
Johor CID chief ACP Abd Aziz Ahmad as saying in a statement that the posts were
published on October 21 and had implied that Sultan Ibrahim was unfit to be the
state ruler. According to the news report, Ahmad is also being investigated
under the Communications and Multimedia Act.
Speaking to The Malaysian Insider later
tonight, Abd Jalil said he still feared for his son’s safety, complaining that
he was in the dark as to what would happen next. He pointed out that since the
magistrate had freed Ahmad from remand, the police should not have carted his
son back to a lock-up.
“As it is, they made us wait in court this morning
from 8.30am until about 4pm before Ahmad was brought to see us,” he said. Abd
Jalil explained that even then, the youth was brought to court by three men,
only one of which was dressed in full police uniform.
The others, he said, were in plainclothes.
“When Ahmad was freed, the driver ― a big guy
dressed in a red shirt ― looked particularly unhappy. “He pulled aside the
inspector and they had a discussion for a while before they took Ahmad back to
their car, instead of releasing him to us.
“That was when we were told that they were acting
on orders from above,” Abd Jalil said.
“Who is that guy in the red shirt? Why was he so
unhappy that Ahmad was freed?” he continued. At present, Abd Jalil said he was
unsure if Ahmad will be brought again to the court tomorrow for the police to
obtain another remand order.
No comments:
Post a Comment